The well-being of a society is established by a well-functioning government authority. However, sometimes these authorities fail to satisfy all the requirements of the citizens or these needs are neglected. In such situations, the society has to stand to maintain the well-being and to get their demands fulfilled by the authority. The society has a right to question authority and thus, it should use it whenever there is a lack of satisfactory work from the authority.
Citizens vote and elect their representatives of the community because they believe that such authorities have capabilities to solve their issues. If such authority fails to address public issues, people will question. For example, if the current public transport is not sufficient to meet the needs of growing population, citizens will have problems to travel around the city. It is the responsibility of the authority to increase the number of public transportations and improve the infrastructure. The governments will only understand the importance and the urgency when people start questioning them. Thus, it helps to restore the lost well-being of a society.
Furthermore, even when government has taken all the necessary steps to enhance the well-being, sometimes people’s queries are missed or unaddressed due to lack of required resources. For instance, during the recent outbreak of Ebola virus in Africa, countries had provided healthcare to people as much as possible but due to lack of qualified doctors and advanced medicines, they were unable to control the outbreak. Thus, even though people expect that the authority should always be responsible to maintain well-being, they should also understand certain limitations. On such occasions, people should work with government and should find a common ground to the problem.
In summary, it is important to question the authority whenever there is a situation of public issue that is not being addressed efficiently. On the other hand, it is equally important for both the society and the authority to work in harmony to find a common ground and derive a salubrious solution to the complications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 336.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39285714286 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18598097503 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502976190476 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3775215405 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.25 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152456464136 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581966324569 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398946237882 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955277446051 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291810961737 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.