The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph informs fish and more food consumption in European country based on data between 1979 and 2004.

Chicken fluctuated dramatically throughout the year but the general trend was upwards. In contrast, Lamb fluctuated but the general trend was downwards. Both of these condition had similarity in unsteady condition.

The other kind of food was fish, which after slow start, Fish began to decrease fluctuated slightly between 1979 and 2004. Fish was the smallest grams per person per week of all fish and meat consumption. By contrast, the first year, in 1979, Beef was the bigest of grams per person per week of all fish and meat, but Beef fluctuated slightly until 1989 than onwards. It decline sharply at the end of the year.

In conclusion, only chicken was stable to rise dramatically, nevertheless it fluctuated between 1979 and 2004. On the other hand, Fish was the most fluctuated slightly in the general trend was downwards.

Votes
Average: 7 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 157 200
No. of Characters: 764 1000
No. of Different Words: 81 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.54 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.866 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.544 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 45 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 41 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 27 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 18 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.7 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.165 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.431 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.674 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.138 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4