The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates information about the number of foods such as chicken, beef, lamb and fish consumed which is in a European country between 1979 and 2004.

In 1979, the most popular food was beef about two hundreds grams per person per week. This situation was very contrast by fish which was around 50 grams per person per week. However, the consumption of beef became fluctuating approximately under 250 grams in the beginning of 1980's even thought it ever was declining significantly from 1989. At the same records, lamb also declined smoothly in the last 14 years in 1990's.

On the contrast, the other one type of food eaten by people in Europe show better track. Chicken rose significantly throughout the 1980's. At the time that, fish was remain constant in 1980's.

Overall, the consumption of beef and lamb declined steadily over the last 26 years in this period whereas chicken skyrocket.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)

Comments

such as chicken, beef, lamb and fish consumed which is in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
such as chicken, beef, lamb and fish which are consumed in a European country between 1979 and 2004.

the other one type of food eaten by people in Europe show better track.
another type of food eaten by people in Europe showed better track.

Sentence: Chicken rose significantly throughout the 1980's. At the time that, fish was remain constant in 1980's.
Description: The token was is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to was and remain

whereas chicken skyrocket.
whereas chickens skyrocket.

flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Words: 153 200

Read a good grammar book. You may read this one: http://testbig.com/question/grammar

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 153 200
No. of Characters: 737 1000
No. of Different Words: 97 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.517 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.817 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.537 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 48 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 34 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 23 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 13 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.125 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.54 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.427 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.705 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.088 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4