The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line chart demonstrate the number of thefts per thousand vehicles in 4 different countries over a nine years period.
Overall, it is evident that great Britain had the highest number of vehicles thievery and the contrast was the case of candan.

To begin, in 1990,the stolen cars in France stood at about 6per thousand, although had a fluctuating rate throughout the given years but later leaped to about 5.5 per thousand of cars in 1999. While Canada on the other hand recorded at about 6 theft per thousand, it later saw a declined in 19993 to 5 theft per thousand of mobile machines, it slightly climbed and had a steady record, owning to 5.5 theft per thousand at the end of 1999.

Furthermore, Sweden accounted for over 7 theft per thousand of vehicles, the amount grew over tbe years and stood at over 11 theft per thousand of mobile machines in 1996,it gradually saw a decrease and stood at about 13 theft per thousand of cars in 1999. On the other hand, UK saw an increasingly high record of theft per thousand vehicles at the initial owning to 17,had a slight climb to 20 theft per thousand cars,it saw a slight decrease over the following few years and skyrocketed to 22 theft per thousand vehicles in 1996,later saw a drop at stood at about 16 theft per thousand mobile machines in 1999.

Votes
Average: 6.9 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d the contrast was the case of candan. To begin, in 1990,the stolen cars in Fra...
^^^
Line 6, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eft per thousand of vehicles, the amount grew over tbe years and stood at over 11...
^^
Line 6, column 421, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...ight climb to 20 theft per thousand cars,it saw a slight decrease over the followin...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62231759657 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51585625308 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467811158798 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.3785734836 43.030603864 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 179.5 112.824112599 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.8333333333 22.9334400587 169% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235939319753 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146767165177 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610514516746 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155143462287 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723984531483 0.0819641961636 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.2329268293 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.29 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.11 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.