The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in proverty in Australia in 1999.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Australia in 1999 has different categories of families living. The table explained that the less of people from each household type living in poverty was aged couple. There was 4 % (48,000 people). The second less of single age person type was 6 % (54,000 person). And in the third place of couple but no children was 7 % (211,000 person). The last was aged couple.
In the highest level of sole parent was 21 % (232,000 person). The second high level of single but no children was 19 % (359,000 person). And the last of the couple with children was 12 % (939,000 person). It means the highest of family type living in proverty in Australia in 1999 was sole parent, that was 21 % of all households (232,000 personal).
The table shows the less and the high family type who living in Australia in 1999 was the aged couple and sole parent. And the all of households was 11 % means 1,837,000 society in Australia in 1999
The table explained that the less of people from each household type living in poverty was aged couple.
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
In the highest level of sole parent was 21 % (232,000 person).
Description: what is the subject for this sentence?
Sentence: The table shows the less and the high family type who living in Australia in 1999 was the aged couple and sole parent.
Description: A WH-pronoun, nominative is not usually followed by a verb, present participle or gerund
Suggestion: Refer to who and living
Sentence: And the all of households was 11 means 1,837,000 society in Australia in 1999
Description: The token the is not usually followed by a determiner/pronoun, pre-quantifier
Suggestion: Refer to the and all
Sentence: It means the highest of family type living in proverty in Australia in 1999 was sole parent, that was 21 of all households 232,000 personal.
Error: proverty Suggestion: property
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
Avg. Sentence Length: 13.417 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.908 7.5
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 9
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 12 10
No. of Words: 161 200
No. of Characters: 713 1000
No. of Different Words: 68 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.562 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.429 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.172 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 54 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 26 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 17 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 11 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 13.417 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.908 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.25 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.401 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.545 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.13 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4