The table below shows the results of surveys in 200, 2005 and 2010 about one university.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table shows students’ percentage of good ratings for various aspects of a particular university. It can be clearly seen that, print resources have the highest figures both in 2000 and 2005, which ends up with showing one of the highest figures in 2010.
Although, at first electronic resources have low percentage (45 percent) in 2000, as the years go by it illustrates a rapid increase in 2005 (72 percent) and the uniform highest figures of 88 percent in 2010 together with print resources. Ratings for teaching quality and range of modules show the identical way of improvement both in 2000 and 2005, 65-63 percent versus 32-33 percent respectively, and as a result teaching quality grow even higher to 69 percent, whereas, range of modules reaches the bottom of 27 percent in 2010.
The only aspect that, ratings maintained stability in both three years is buildings/teaching facilities which shows constant 77 percent.
teaching quality grow even higher
teaching quality grows even higher
ratings maintained stability in both three years is buildings/teaching facilities which shows constant 77 percent.
ratings which maintained stability in both three years is buildings/teaching facilities which shows constant 77 percent.
flaws:
No. of Words: 153 200
Avg. Sentence Length: 30.6 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 5 10
No. of Words: 153 200
No. of Characters: 754 1000
No. of Different Words: 90 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.517 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.928 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.59 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 57 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 52 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 24 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 16 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 30.6 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.532 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.529 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.792 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.175 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4