In some cases, when we go into a restaurant or receive home delivery, a student wearing a gown to work on the other end provides the service. There are a few factors that encourage students to do short-term jobs and this tendency has both positive and negative sides.
First, in terms of benefits, youth reap a lot of benefits by working part-time. The additional income source helps them support the family besides covering their own expenses. If a student is cautious enough to obtain a position in a field that is relevant to their field of study, the work experience will raise their resume standards. Students can also manage their time effectively while working part-time. Furthermore, an organized lifestyle prevents young people from indulging in unwanted activities.
On the downside, working while studying makes students have little or no time to nurture their interests or talents. Furthermore, students working part-time face a lot of pressure at such a young age. It can even affect their performance at school or university as they may not have enough time for their studies. Many scientific researchers have proven that the academic performance of young people with part-time jobs is not equal to those of young people who do not work part-time.
In conclusion, after analyzing the situation, it is not difficult to realize that working from home has both advantages and disadvantages. If students choose to work, care should be taken to ensure that their health and study are not affected.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, if, may, so, while, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1234.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97580645161 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63292557555 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588709677419 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 248.0 22.4926829268 1103% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1234.0 112.824112599 1094% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 248.0 22.9334400587 1081% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 83.0 5.23603664747 1585% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0560221234554 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560221234554 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0392226609951 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00812129885575 0.0819641961636 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 126.0 13.2329268293 952% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -180.24 61.2550243902 -294% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 100.0 10.3012195122 971% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.08 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 19.95 8.06136585366 247% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 11.4329268293 464% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 101.2 10.9970731707 920% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 126.0 11.0658536585 1139% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.