Average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services , 2001-2010
The line graph illustrates the average amount of money that people spend on cell phone and residential phone services per year over a period of 10 years from 2001 to 2010.
It is clear that the mobile phone services increased dramatically , while the residential phone services declined sharply in 10 years. In 2006, the money spent on cell phone services surpassed the spending on residential phone services.
In 2001, American spent nearly 700$ on residential phone services, compared to over 200$ on cell phone services. In the
next 5 years, although, there was a significant fall, nearly 200$, in the spending for landline services, the cell phone services increased approximately 300$ in their income.
In 2005, people living in America spent the same amount of money on both the cell phone and residential phone services, which is about 500$. The expenditure on cell phone services kept rocketing and was about 800$ in 2010. However, the income of the landline phones services plummeted to a bit over 400$ in the same year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...le phone services increased dramatically , while the residential phone services de...
^^
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$700'.
Suggestion: $700
...ices. In 2001, American spent nearly 700$ on residential phone services, compared...
^^^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$200'.
Suggestion: $200
...ential phone services, compared to over 200$ on cell phone services. In the next 5...
^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ed to over 200$ on cell phone services. In the next 5 years, although, there was...
^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...over 200$ on cell phone services. In the next 5 years, although, there was a sign...
^^^
Line 6, column 62, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$200'.
Suggestion: $200
...h, there was a significant fall, nearly 200$, in the spending for landline services,...
^^^^
Line 6, column 155, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$300'.
Suggestion: $300
... phone services increased approximately 300$ in their income. In 2005, people liv...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... approximately 300$ in their income. In 2005, people living in America spent th...
^^
Line 8, column 136, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$500'.
Suggestion: $500
...idential phone services, which is about 500$. The expenditure on cell phone services...
^^^^
Line 8, column 210, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$800'.
Suggestion: $800
...e services kept rocketing and was about 800$ in 2010. However, the income of the lan...
^^^^
Line 8, column 300, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$400'.
Suggestion: $400
...phones services plummeted to a bit over 400$ in the same year.
^^^^
Line 8, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to a bit over 400$ in the same year.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09356725146 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64009188878 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502923976608 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0181477303 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.875 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 1.69756097561 707% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.569914580981 0.215688989381 264% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.299997944118 0.103423049105 290% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964259169609 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.348831833982 0.15604864568 224% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104918812819 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.