The bar chart below shows the estimated sales of jeans for two companies in 2014 in Turkey. The pie chart shows the projected market share of the two companies in jeans at the end of 2015.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented bar chart compares two distinct jeans enterprises in term of their sale estimation in 2014, while the pie chart indicates a prediction of market share in 2015. Both graphs refer to Turkey.
Overall, it is evident that jeans business of both Mango as well as Jack & Jones expanded in 2014. In addition, they are expected to account for a half of market share in the next year.
Turning into detail, there were approximately 450 thousand pairs of jeans sold by Jack & Jones supply chains, which was 3 times higher than that of Mango. Over the next 5 months, the figure for Mango grew gradually to above 200 thousand pairs, whereas that of Jack & Jones declined considerably in February, before gaining moderately to 400 pairs in June. Afterwards, the latter remained steady by August, overtaken by the former, which increased mildly to about 500 thousand pairs. However, Mango could not maintain its increment until December, when a remarkable climb to 600 thousand pairs was witnessed. Meanwhile, jeans transaction of Jack & Jones enhanced quickly, returning as the larger retailer by hitting the peak of 900 thousand pairs at the end of 2014.
Regarding to the market share anticipation, in comparison to Jack & Jones, which is forecast to occupy nearly one third of total Turkish jeans sale, the expected proportion for Mango is significantly lower, with 20%. Nevertheless, their predicted sum cannot surpass that of other brands, which are expected to make up exactly 50%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ident that jeans business of both Mango as well as Jack & Jones expanded in 2014. In addit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 138, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'jeans'' or 'jean's'?
Suggestion: jeans'; jean's
...ccupy nearly one third of total Turkish jeans sale, the expected proportion for Mango...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, third, well, whereas, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15573770492 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68548304113 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 106.607317073 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635245901639 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3197720987 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.363636364 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203495175973 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761911714442 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100225739199 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152491886764 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120204711979 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.