The bar chart below shows the exporting rate of 4 different types of fruit in the USA, Mexico and South Africa in 2012, measured by tons.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The bar chart below shows the exporting rate of 4 different types of fruit in the USA, Mexico and South Africa in 2012, measured by tons.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The presented column graph compares 3 distinct nations in terms of their fruit exporting capacity in 2012.

Overall, it is evident that orange was exported with the highest amount among 4 items by all countries. However, regarding to individual types of fruit, the largest exporting capabilities were occupied by different nations.

Turning into detail, over 1000 tons of orange was sold abroad by the USA in 2012, followed by a below – 1000 – ton figure of Mexico. Likewise, the USA and Mexico were also the two countries having the biggest masses of exported lemon among 3 nations, with more than 700 tons and above 600 tons, respectively. By contrast, the figures for South Africa were significantly lower, making it rank third in both sections.

With respect to remaining fruits, in foreign sales of grape and other fruit, South Africa surpassed other countries with the highest amount of about 500 tons and exactly 200 tons, respectively. Meanwhile, The USA and Mexico shared the same amount of grape with over 300 tons, whereas the former’s number of other fruit was slightly higher than the latter’s.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 417, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... making it rank third in both sections. With respect to remaining fruits, in for...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...slightly higher than the latter's.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, regarding, so, third, whereas, while, with respect to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15760869565 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64346731083 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619565217391 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0052845158 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.625 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202050255994 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868090910707 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0258222276037 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115294540274 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216346543638 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.