The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.
The given bar chart compares the proportion of Australian men and women in six age groups who was (were) active physically in (on) a regular basis in 2010.
Overall, women did more regular physical activity than men in five of six age groups over the given period. The most physically active age group in men was 15 to 24, compared to 45 to 54 in women. Furthermore, the most significant difference between two genders was on 45 to 54 age group.
In terms of the youngest age category 15 to 24, the proportion of physically active men was slightly higher than their counterpart (52.8% and 47.7% respectively).
On the other hand, the figure for regular physical activity on the remaining groups was higher in women. 48.9% of women aged 25 to 34 were active physically as opposed to men at 42.2% in the same age group. Similarly, over half of the Australian women did some physical activity in a regular basis, which was far more higher than men whose figure ranging from 39.5% to 45.1%. Finally, almost equivalent data at 47% was recorded in both genders in 65 and over age group.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...men and women in six age groups who was were active physically in on a regular basis...
^^^^
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...ivity in a regular basis, which was far more higher than men whose figure ranging from 39.5...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, similarly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65104166667 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55613517638 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484375 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3636397239 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2222222222 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465461277556 0.215688989381 216% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.232640462391 0.103423049105 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12259811253 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.324063262788 0.15604864568 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134120543283 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...men and women in six age groups who was were active physically in on a regular basis...
^^^^
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...ivity in a regular basis, which was far more higher than men whose figure ranging from 39.5...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, similarly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65104166667 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55613517638 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484375 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3636397239 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2222222222 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465461277556 0.215688989381 216% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.232640462391 0.103423049105 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12259811253 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.324063262788 0.15604864568 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134120543283 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.