The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
The given bar chart compares the percentage of different age categories of men and women from Australia who did consistent physical activities in the year 2010.
Overall, it is seen that females between 45 to 54 age were the highest in the given year. Whereas, at the same point the male section was at the topmost in the age group of 15 to 24.
It is evident from the graph that the age of 15-24 was the only one where the percentage of men section was more than that of women which was 52.8% for males and 47.7% for females. It is interesting to note that both gentlemen and ladies of age 65 and above did almost equal physical tasks that are around 47%.
However, further analysis of the graph shows that the female percentage from the age of 35 to 64 was revolving around 52.9%. In addition, the women group between the age of 25-34 was approximately 50%. Moreover, the male portion was above 40% in the age group of 25 to 34, 45 to 54, and 55 to 64 but men from the group of 35-44 were in the opposite position that was under 40%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... physical activities in the year 2010. Overall, it is seen that females between...
^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...age were the highest in the given year. Whereas, at the same point the male section wa...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the highest in the given year. Whereas, at the same point the male section was a...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... opposite position that was under 40%.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.32487309645 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27355640429 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507614213198 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7549665607 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304404384527 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142942210225 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139240799728 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21824585469 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.168141893898 0.0819641961636 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.07 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.