The given bar graph compares the electricity generated in and utilized by ten different countries in 2014.
Overall, while China was the dominant producer as well as consumer of electricity, Korea accounted for the lowest electricity production and consumption. In comparison, the electricity production and consumption of India, Canada, France, Brazil and Germany was nowhere near as high as that of China and United States.
In terms of electricity produced, China came top of the list at 5398 billion kwh, just ahead of United States, producing 4099 billion kwh. Similarly, United States came second, with the production of 4099 kwh of electricity as opposed to Russia at 1057 billion kwh in the third place. By contrast, the least production was made by Korea at just 485.1 billion kwh.
China was also the number-one consumer, with 5322 billion kwh of electricity consumed. Likewise, Korea stood second at 3886 billion kwh, nearly three times as high as is consumed by Russia. Korea came last on the list at 499.5 billion kwh.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, second, similarly, so, third, well, while, as well as, in the third place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14371257485 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70410834535 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556886227545 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9883022931 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4444444444 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 5.23603664747 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144763105217 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729695413514 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048514846795 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105764619728 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052559803035 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.