The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003, and projections for 2050.
The given graph illustrates the proportion of global population in four nations, namely India, China, USA and Japan in 1950 and 2020 and make projections for 2050.
It is noticeable that the apart from India, all other countries witnessed declines in their population rates over the 1950-2002 period. In 1950, China’ s population accounted for the highest percentage of the world (approximately 23%). Having suffered a 3% drop in 52 years, China still remained the most populous nation in 2002. Simutaneouly, the trends was similar to USA and Japan. The population proportions in USA and Japan considerably decreased from 7% and nearly 5% to 5% and 3%, correspondingly. In contrast, India experienced a significant rise, making up for 13% of the world in 2002.
In addition, it is predicted that the figure for India will follow an upward trend, reaching 19%, whereas, China is projected to decrease its population percentage to 15% in 2050. Consequently, India will replace China to be the nation with the largest rate in global population. Moreover, Japan is projected to suffer a sharp drop, sinking to a new low of around 1 %. Meanwhile, the USA is expected to remain its population proportion at 5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd 2020 and make projections for 2050. It is noticeable that the apart from Ind...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aking up for 13% of the world in 2002. In addition, it is predicted that the fi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, moreover, still, whereas, while, apart from, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09045226131 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02237902984 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608040201005 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8868746005 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0909090909 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251150587671 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960888895954 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854093643646 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181997922681 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279516722148 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.