The bar chart shows for the production and consumption of electricity in top ten countries in 2014

Essay topics:

The bar chart shows for the production and consumption of electricity in top ten countries in 2014

The bar chart gives information about the production and usage of electricity in top 10 countries in 2014.
Overall, it is clear from the chat that China accounted the highest position in the production and consumption of electricity, whereas Korea accounted the lowest position.
China produced 5398 kWh of electricity which was higher than the power produced by the United States at 4099 kWh. Interestingly, China used almost full amount of electricity that produced at 5322 kWh. The United States used 3866 kWh of electricity they produced. The third position accounted for the Russia in the production and consumption of electricity at 1057 kWh and 1038 kWh and their amount of production and consumption of electricity is almost similar. Japan and India were in the fourth and fifth position in the production and consumption of electricity.
Korea had the lowest position in the production and consumption of electricity at 485.1 and 449.5 kWh respectively. France and Brazil had almost similar amount in production and consumption of electricity at 561.2 and 462.9 and 530.7 and 455.8 kWh respectively. Noticeably Germany used 57.9 kWh electricity more than their produced.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of electricity, whereas Korea accounted the lowest position. China produced 539...
^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n and India were in the fourth and fifth position in the production and consumpti...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, third, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 3.97073170732 479% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33155080214 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06369978923 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449197860963 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0258563056 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.625 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295455873936 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159486071097 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122638599414 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214011304646 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136575119203 0.0819641961636 167% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.