The chart and graph give information about three categories of workers in Australia and the unemployment levels within those groups.
The given chart and graph provide data on Australia's different origins of the workforce in 2003 as well as the unemployment rate within those groups from 1993 to 2003.
Overall, all 3 groups of workers experienced a downward trend in the number of people being unemployed from 1993 to 2003, whereas in 2003, workers from Australia took up the largest proportion among 3 different origin groups.
In 1993, the percentage of unemployed workers born in non-English-speaking countries (NESC) ranked in the first place with roughly 7%. This number oversaw a dramatic decrease to around 4% in 1998 before gradually dropping to 3% in 2003. Starting at the same rate of 4% in 1993, the proportion of unemployment among workers from English-speaking countries and Australia underwent the same path of slow decline to approximately 2% in 2003.
In 2003, the number of workers originating from Australia was recorded at 76%, the largest number among the 3 groups, whereas the rate of workers from NESC ranked second at 14% and that of ESC came last, at only 10%.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, well, whereas, as well as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01704545455 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99102803542 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534090909091 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.0582955736 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.166666667 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 5.23603664747 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188041680759 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105031380599 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801240490215 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139041147973 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740521716784 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, well, whereas, as well as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01704545455 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99102803542 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534090909091 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.0582955736 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.166666667 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 5.23603664747 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188041680759 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105031380599 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801240490215 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139041147973 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740521716784 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.