The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The bar chart provide a breakdown of striking information regarding the past changes and future predictions of Japan's population, from 1950 to 2055. While the table higlights the comparative data about population aged 65 years or over and their percentage in the community during the same time period.
The more detailed look illustrates that the Japanese population experienced significant upward tendency, from 1950 to 2005 and numbers increases from 84.1 million to 127.8 million. However, for next 10 year Japanese population saw a negligible downward trend from 127.8 million to 125.4 million. Nonetheless, experts are anticipating that reduction in population will sustain and it will decrease to 89,9 million, by 2055.
At the same time, table delineates that older population accounts more proportion of overall population as time passes. In 1950, population aged over 65 was only possessed 4.9% with 4.1 million. However, by 2005 25.7 million of old-aged citizens accounted for 20% of Japanese population. Correspondingly, it is expected that their number will reach 36.5 million, by 2055 and they will be 41% of the whole country.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, nonetheless, regarding, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42134831461 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93054408347 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640449438202 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0522179293 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.222222222 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103203638445 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458123840032 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405918065811 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.08305210671 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052364090377 0.0819641961636 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.