The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The bar chart illustrates the percentages of global population and distribution of wealth by 8 regions all around the world. Overall, North America has the highest gap between the population and global wealth percentages. The highest population and global wealth are reported in China and Europe respectively.
Regionally, China has the highest population between the other regions, with almost a quarter of world’s population. Other Asia Pacific and Europe have a similar number of populations, with just over 15% of the world's population. Followed by Europe, Africa, Latin America & Carribean, and North America with 15%, 10%, around 8%, and more than 5% in succession. The region with the least population is Rich Asia-Pacific, with only 5%.
According to the graph, the highest global wealth percentage is North America, with just below 35%. Followed by Europe and Rich Asia-Pacific with 30% and less than 25% successively. China, Other Asia Pacific, China, Latin America & Carribean have the same percentages of global wealth, with roughly 3%. The lowest percentages of global wealth are in India and Africa, which are approximately 2%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
... populations, with just over 15% of the worlds population. Followed by Europe, Africa,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44943820225 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91036886212 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52808988764 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.2199599931 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.1818181818 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1818181818 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.636363636364 5.23603664747 12% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164041031548 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861150883338 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734140724433 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138886436918 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835657572706 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.