The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart demonstrates the correlation between a population of a certain region of the world and its position on a global wealth scale.
It is evident that both North America and Rich Asia Pacific countries score high in terms of financial capabilities while being not as densely populated. Europe, meanwhile, has much more residents than the countries mentioned above put together, this, however, does not noticeably affect its GDP and brings it to the third spot of the global chart.
China, Other Asia Pacific countries, India and Africa display the opposite tendency, thus proving these regions to be heavily populated, although severely lacking funds.
Looking at the diagram, it is logical to conclude that China has the most apparent difference between the number of residents and the amount of finance they possess, its wealth, comparable to other vastly inhabited areas, puts it on par with Other Asia Pacific Counties and slightly below Latin America and Caribbean. The number of its residents, however, leaves this country completely unrivalled.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, third, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38095238095 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64564417611 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.690476190476 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.1379850626 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.666666667 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0857084512319 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450048142049 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560864377735 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0631486121266 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586357883719 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 61.2550243902 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.06136585366 130% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.