The chart below show the proportions of British student at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addtion to English, in 2000 and 2010.
The pie charts compare the percentage of the British students who were able to speak other languages than English in 2000 and 2010.
Generally, there was a variation in the percentage of England students in terms of speak other languages. Besides, it is obvious that British students at university in England had trend learning Spanish language between 2000 and 2010.
It is clear from the pie charts show that in 2000, 20% students in England cannot speak other languages while in 2010, this precentage decreased a half ( 10%). Besides, the percentage of British students who speak two other languages increased from 10% to 15% between 2000 ang 2010. This show that today, students in England had trend learning more languages than in the past. In addition, the percentage of student in British who were able to speak Spanish language accounted the highest proportion ( 30% in 2000 and 35% in 2010). Furthermore, students in university England who were able to speak another languages also rose from 15% to 20% in this period.
On the other hand, in 2000, German only and two other languages has the lowest proportion (10%) while in 2010, the percentage of students in England who were able to speak French, German and cannot speak other languages has the lowest proportion ( 10%). It is clearly that the percentage of German only still remained in this period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n 2010, this precentage decreased a half 10%. Besides, the percentage of British ...
^^
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...anguage accounted the highest proportion 30% in 2000 and 35% in 2010. Furthermore...
^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd 35% in 2010. Furthermore, students in university England who were able to spea...
^^
Line 4, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther languages has the lowest proportion 10%. It is clearly that the percentage o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, so, still, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94298245614 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50036547036 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.372807017544 0.547539520022 68% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5669159804 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.7 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.569782018382 0.215688989381 264% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.272984571033 0.103423049105 264% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13333233208 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.411667510171 0.15604864568 264% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0911790938088 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.67 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.