The chart below shows the amount of area used for growing grains between 1990 and 2010 in a state in Canada.
The provided bar graph gives information about amount of land used for growing grains during 1990, 2000 and 2010 in a state in Canada.
Overall, it is clear that Red field observed the maximum acres of land for growing grains, while the least area accounted for others.
As can be seen from the graph that Red field shared same amount of land for growing grains in 1990 and 2000, it was exact 60 acres but, it dropped to at around 53 acres in 2010. However, the least piece of land was used by others (below 5 acres) in the given year.
With regards to further information, Sunny valley and Spring plains saw the fluctuation in used area for grow grains. Below 40 acres land used by Sunny valley in 1990, which inclined to near 43 acres in the middle year and went down sharply at around 38 acres in 2010. While, Spring plains used 35 acres in 1990 and after sharp decline in 2000 it went up to 22 acres in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her information, Sunny valley and Spring plains saw the fluctuation in used area ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 754.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.38372093023 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.98043431219 2.65546596893 75% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9306721899 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.714285714 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329716462613 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170120228444 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985655621225 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230808171506 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0997451608641 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.42 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.