The chart below shows the amount of money given to developing countries from five organisations from 2008 to 2011.
The bar chart demonstrates how much money spending for developing nations from 5 organizations between 2008 to 2011.
Overall, there was an increase in data of organization 1 and organization 2 and a drop in organization 4 and 5 while a variation in organization 3. The amount of money that was spent by organization 2 witnessed the dramatic growth.
The data of money which was given by organization 3 started at 1.25 billion dollars, after which it experienced a remarkable rise to nearly 2.5 billion dollars, before ending the period at approximately 3.15 billion dollars. When it came to organization 1, 0.65 billion dollars were spent in 2008, with a subsequent considerable growth to nearly 1 billion dollars, and a final leveling off at 1.75 billion dollars. As for organization 3, the figure stood at 1.5 billion dollars, followed by a fluctuation before ending the period with the same data in 2008.
The organization 4 spent 0.65 billion dollars to developing countries, after it witnessed a dramatic decline to 0,45 billion dollars in the end of the period. Similarly changes in organization 5 ,but to lesser extent, the amount of money was at 1.25 billion dollars in the first year, after it fell sharply to 0.45 billion dollars in 2011.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...organization 3. The amount of money that was spent by organization 2 witnessed th...
^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...llion dollars in the end of the period. Similarly changes in organization 5 ,but to lesse...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 195, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...iod. Similarly changes in organization 5 ,but to lesser extent, the amount of mone...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, similarly, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99523809524 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06298581227 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490476190476 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8442162368 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.125 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118716489127 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756225009021 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900152543507 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112170541996 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109212835114 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.