The stipulated bar diagram shows the amount of money spent by the different income groups on fast foods in United Kingdom during the year 1990. Whereas, the line graph depicts the information regarding the consumption of fast foods for a span of 20 years from 1970 to 1990. The mentioned parameters are hamburger, fish & chips and pizza.
It is evident from the data that, hamburger was the most popular fast food item in almost all income categories except low income group. People in the high income brackets spent almost 42% percent of their total fast food spendings on hamburgers. Their least popular food was fish and chips, which was only accounted for 17% of their spendings on fat foods. While, low income earners spent most of their money on fish and chips but, proportion was exactly same as the high income groups least favourable option(17%). Among average income brackets, hamburgers accounted for the highest percentage (33%) and their popular preference was pizza (12%).
As it is shown in the graph, fish and chips showed a gradual increase during the period of 1970 - 1990. In 1970, it was only the second most consumed item at that time, but when it reached the end of period 1990, it outpaced all other competitors by far. From 100 grams, it's figures were rocketed to a staggering amount 500grams in just over a 20 years of time. Hamburgers also showed same trend, started off with just 20 grams in 1970 and ended up with second popular item (290 grams) in 1990. Whereas, pizza consumption showed a completely different trend. From its leading position (300 grams) in 1970, the fast food item witnessed a sharp decline in its popularity and ended in last position (200 grams) at the end of the period.
In conclusion, hamburgers were pick of the item for majority of the people during 1990's. The fast-food item fish and chips showed an extraordinary increase in its popularity during the period of just 20 yers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir popular preference was pizza 12%. As it is shown in the graph, fish and ch...
^^^
Line 5, column 494, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... second popular item 290 grams in 1990. Whereas, pizza consumption showed a completely ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 32, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'picked'.
Suggestion: picked
...riod. In conclusion, hamburgers were pick of the item for majority of the people ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1990s'.
Suggestion: during the 1990s
... of the item for majority of the people during 1990s. The fast-food item fish and chips show...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, second, so, whereas, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 965.302439024 165% => OK
No of words: 331.0 196.424390244 169% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82175226586 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43799830345 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 106.607317073 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486404833837 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 453.6 283.868780488 160% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4792697289 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.75 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1875 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229485728485 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872308439906 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796628608375 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158370668195 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700681822989 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.