The stipulated bar diagram shows the percentage of time spend by the school children on chatting and playing video games in the web on an average academic day in United Kingdom. The mentioned parameters are 4 hours plus, 1 to 3 hours and less than 1 hour.
In terms of chatting perspective girls spend more time than boys, 68% and 53% respectively. Some girls (8%) even spend almost 4 plus hours on chatting on the worldwide web, which is equal to 3 fold of boys figures (3%) who do the same. Whereas, one forth percentage of boys and girls are spending less than an hour on online chatting. Approximately 5% of students are addicted to this new medium of communication irrespective of gender.
When it comes to online gaming boys leading in front, a staggering 83% of boys spend their time on internet gaming consoles. In that, 8% of boys are addicted to these kind of games, utilizing more than 4 hours of time just for the same. While girls are less prone to internet games, only a very small percentage (2%) of girls spend more time on this. But at the same time Majority of boys (43%) prefer to play online games for a short amount of time.
In conclusion, girls and boys has different interest in terms of their internet activity. Girls love to chat more on the web whereas, boys love to play games on online gaming consoles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
... almost 4 plus hours on chatting on the world wide wide, which is equal to 3 fold of boys ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
... almost 4 plus hours on chatting on the world wide wide, which is equal to 3 fold of boys ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: wide
...t 4 plus hours on chatting on the world wide wide, which is equal to 3 fold of boys figur...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...old of boys figures 3% who do the same. whereas, one forth percentage of boys, girls an...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...es. In that, 8% of boys are addicted to these kind of games, utilizing more than 4 hours o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52459016393 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49978499479 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512295081967 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9994658065 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240784908662 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966200521429 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891905505961 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159013716709 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566298016797 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.