The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the changes that took place in three different forms of crime in Newport City centre from 2003-2012.
There was approximately 3400 recorded burglary in 2003. In 2004 it peaked to 3,800 however it showed a gradual decline from 2005 to 2008. A slight increase of 1, 400 in 2009 and followed by unsteady trend from 2010 to 2012.
The unsteady trend was evident in car theft. There were 2,800 recorded car theft in 2003 moreover it almost stayed the same in 2004 and 2005. In 2006 it dropped to 2,100 and followed by a rise and fall in numbers from 2007 to 2012.
On the other hand, robbery showed a more stable yet unsteady trend. There were approximately 700 recorded robbery in 2003, in addition to that an increase to 800 in 2004 and 900 in 2005 which was the highest recorded. It was followed by a continous decline from 2006 to 2008. The unsteady trend continued from 2009 to 2012.
In conclusion, burglary was the most prevalent crime in Newport city centre.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65909090909 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4252247063 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517045454545 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7302689004 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.3333333333 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6666666667 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17851776736 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720255952051 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841096415454 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128286402417 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106853113133 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 91.11 61.2550243902 149% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.0 10.3012195122 39% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.66 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.