The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005.
The pie charts compare the proportion of energy production in France in two years 1995 and 2005.
It is clear that gas and coal have highest proportion of total energy production in the period shown. In addition, the figure for nuclear and Other was the lowest.
In 1995, the proportion of Coal in France was highest, at 29.8% of total energy production, while the figures for Gas and Petro were slightly lower at 29.63% and 29.27% respectively. By contrast, the figure for Nuclear and Other was significantly lower at 6.4% and 4.9% respectively.
In 2005, the proportion of Nuclear and other rapidly increase to 10.10% and 9.10% of total energy production. At the same time, the figure for Gas and Goal was remained at around 30% while Petro experienced a rapid decrease to 19.55%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n in France in two years 1995 and 2005. It is clear that gas and coal have highe...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 31, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the highest'.
Suggestion: have the highest
...5. It is clear that gas and coal have highest proportion of total energy production i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 664.0 965.302439024 69% => OK
No of words: 134.0 196.424390244 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9552238806 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.40232815919 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65939827744 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 70.0 106.607317073 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522388059701 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 188.1 283.868780488 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1377760714 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8571428571 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15696878643 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920420608835 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123894102214 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143035136205 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135944723063 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.