The chart below shows the figures (in thousand) for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.
The chart illustrates the imprisonment in five nations from 1930 to 1980. At first glance, United States had the highest average amount of imprisonment while Great Britain held the lowest imprisonment rate.
In 1930, Canada had the highest imprisonment rate with 120,000 custodies, followed by the United States and New Zealand with 100,000 cases. Australia had the much lower imprisonment rate with approximately 70,000 cases while Britain held the lowest figure with only nearly 30,000 captures.
In 1940, the figure of Great Britain remained unchanged while Australia and New Zealand ‘s figures decreased steeply. These figures stayed almost constant in the following two decades. On the other hand, United States became the nation with the highest capture rate at the time with over 120,000 cases followed by Canada with around 110,000 cases. Both figures experienced a fluctuation in twenty years. In 1960, the United States again held the highest imprisonment rate with almost 120,000 custodies while Canada recorded precisely 100,000 cases.
Great Britain, Australia and New Zealand shared an equal capture rate in 1970 as all of them recorded nearly 70,000 cases. Another noticeable feature is that the capture rate in United States and Canada decreased to over 90,000 and over 80,000 cases. There were significant changes in 1980 as Great Britain and New Zealand number of imprisonment cases rose to over 80,000 while the number of custodies in Australia fell a third. America confinement rate rocketed to over 130,000 captures. In contrast, the figure of Canada increased unnoticeably, reached nearly 90,000.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, third, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 965.302439024 143% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46428571429 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55561409279 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472222222222 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.0 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9893365851 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3571428571 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21428571429 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113044298189 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637963736743 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840849145896 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104045200048 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748848113038 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.