The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010.
The provided bar chart compares the GDP growth in Tunisia, Japan and Ecuador for the period between 2007 and 2010. The GDP growth fluctuated in Ecuador, while this figure substantially changed in Tunisia and Japan during the given period of time.
Initially, in 2007, Tunisia showed the most growth at over 6 per cent in GDP; whereas, this figure was twice less for Ecuador, and there was the least growth in Japan at 2 per cent. The GDP growth was almost equal in the countries in 2008 between 4.1 and 4.9 per cents. One year later, there was a substantial decrease in GDP to 1.3 per cent in Ecuador, then a year later again this figure increased to just over 2 per cent. In contrast, Japan significantly gained in GDP growth reaching 5.2 per cent and 6.5 per cent in 2009 and 2010, respectively. In the same period of time Tunisian economy showed that GDP growth leveled off at 3 per cent.
The infographic indicates there were substantial changes in GDP growth in the countries throughout 4-year period between 2007 and 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...d in Tunisia and Japan during the given period of time. Initially, in 2007, Tunisia showed t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 563, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...009 and 2010, respectively. In the same period of time Tunisian economy showed that GDP growth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 645, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t GDP growth leveled off at 3 per cent. The infographic indicates there were sub...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67582417582 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46713086274 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494505494505 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8484726632 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.432954033191 0.215688989381 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.229495324072 0.103423049105 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906925475208 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.316769555086 0.15604864568 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467369968385 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.