The chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism-related industries in one UK city between 1989 and 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism-related industries in one UK city between 1989 and 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given bar chart compares 3 travel-involved economic sectors in terms of their number of jobs in a certain British urban area from 1989 to 2009.

Overall, restaurant was the industry which created the most jobs among 3 surveyed categories during the period. In addition, it was a sector displaying an upward trend, while the two remaining counterparts expressed discernible declines throughout these two decades.

Turning into detail, in 1989, there were around 1100 employees working at the city’s restaurants. The figure increased remarkably, before reaching the peak of 1400 jobs in 2004. Despite a minor decrease throughout the remainders of the period, it still remained the largest industry with respect to the capacity of labors, compared to other items.

Regarding to the remaining sectors, sport and leisure as well as travel and tours shared the similar worker numbers of around 800 between 1989 and 1994. In the next 10 years, while jobs created by sport and leisure was kept stable at approximately 800, that of travel and tours fell dramatically to exactly 600. At the end of the stage, the former’s figure was almost twice as many as the latter’s, with nearly 700 and precisely 400 employees, respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 469, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... precisely 400 employees, respectively.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, still, well, while, in addition, as well as, with respect to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28140703518 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9013388682 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658291457286 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1814248377 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.777777778 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116273042862 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469272119944 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404135742336 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0732075256315 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372827919447 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.