The bar chart illustrates the quantity of male and female in full-time and part-time further education in three periods (1970/71, 1980/81 and 1990/91) in the UK. Units are measured in thousands people.
Overall, enrollment of female student in secondary education increased over a span of twenty years for full-time and part-time education. In the meantime, admission of full-time male students also raised; whereas, admittence of part-time male students fluctuated.
First, looking at the figures of men in further education, it is obvious that the number of part-time studnets were more than full-time students. The quantity male students in part-time education was approximately 1 million in the period of 1970/71 and the number of full-time was over 100 thousand. However, the amount of male students in part-time education dropped to over 800 thousand in 1980/81 before expended to almost 900 thousand in 1990/91.
Turning to the graph of female students, it is evident that the amount of female student in part-time education increased moderately from less than 800 thousand in 1970/71 to more than 800 thousand in 1980/81. Thereafter, the number boomed to nearly 1.1 million in 1990/91.By contrast, the quantity of full-time students rocketed from less than 100 thousand in 1970/71 to more than 200 in 1980/81. Afterward, it continued a sligh increase in 1990/91.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart illustrates the quantity o...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts are measured in thousands people. Overall, enrollment of female student in...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... part-time male students fluctuated. First, looking at the figures of men in ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to almost 900 thousand in 1990/91. Turning to the graph of female students,...
^^^^
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
...boomed to nearly 1.1 million in 1990/91.By contrast, the quantity of full-time stu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, look, second, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1165.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41860465116 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83100350662 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46511627907 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6067189215 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332783723264 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164574437638 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118997291367 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255779441052 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0935295076752 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.