The stipulated bar diagram illustrates number of commuters used various airport in Newyork for a span of 5 years from 1995 to 2000. The mentioned parameters are John F. Kennedy, LaGuardia and Newark airports.
In all these years most of the travelers used LaGuardia airport for their journey except in 1997. The travelers numbers were at peak during the year 2000 where 680 million passengers used the airport. whereas the John F. Kennedy airport secured the second position in 1995 and 1996 with 25 million and 35 million visitors respectively and even surpassed the LeGuardia airport in 1997 by obtaining the number one position.
A detailed view of the data shows that unlike LaGuardia and Newark, the travelers who used John F. Kennedy airport flectuated over the period of 5 years. Whereas the other airports showed a gradual increase in the mentioned period in terms of travelers. Furthermore , during the years of 1998 to 2000, the Newark airport figures were constant at just over 400 million commuters.
In conclusion, all the airport received a fair of number visitors in the 5 years of time. But the John F. Kennedy airport outnumbered all the other airports by significant figures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'travelers'' or 'traveler's'?
Suggestion: travelers'; traveler's
...t for their journey except in 1997. The travelers numbers were at peak during the year 20...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'number'.
Suggestion: number
...r journey except in 1997. The travelers numbers were at peak during the year 2000 where...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...80 million passengers used the airport. whereas the John F. Kennedy airport secured the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... flectuated over the period of 5 years. Whereas the other airports showed a gradual inc...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...eriod in terms of travelers. Furthermore , during the years of 1998 to 2000, the N...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, second, whereas, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07070707071 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66085977516 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540404040404 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.1952343313 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.7142857143 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1428571429 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195353358661 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066399567764 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556217605077 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126444289138 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312556806345 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.53 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.