The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000

Essay topics:

 The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.

The bar chart gives information about how many tourists used three different airports in New York City from 1995 to 2000.
It is clear that the amount of passengers using John F.Kennedy fluctuated during the period shown, while others had an upward trend. In addition, the figure for LaGuardia experienced the highest uses throughout this period.
In 1995, LaGuardia saw the largest number, which was about 35 millions, compared to about 27millions of John F.Kennedy and only 17 millions of Newwark. The number of travellers using John F.Kennedy witnessed an upward trend and reached its peak at 48 millions in 1997. However, in 1999, the figure dipped by approximately 15 millions. In 2000, there was a moderate growth to about 42 millions. ( which airport ? )
It can be seen that the figures for LaGuardia and Newwark both had an upward trend ( registered growing trend ) . However, LaGuardia substantially rose over the five-year period and remarkably stood at 68 millions in 2000. In contrast, Newark's number increased significantly to 42 millions in 1998 and remained stable in the last two years.

Votes
Average: 6 (15 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 56, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Kennedy
...t the amount of passengers using John F.Kennedy fluctuated during the period shown, whi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Kennedy
... compared to about 27millions of John F.Kennedy and only 17 millions of Newwark. The nu...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '17 million'.
Suggestion: 17 million
...t 27millions of John F.Kennedy and only 17 millions of Newwark. The number of travellers using...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Kennedy
.... The number of travellers using John F.Kennedy witnessed an upward trend and reached i...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
... moderate growth to about 42 millions. which airport ? It can be seen that the f...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to about 42 millions. which airport ? It can be seen that the figures for LaGu...
^^^^
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dia and Newwark both had an upward trend registered growing trend . However, LaG...
^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n upward trend registered growing trend . However, LaGuardia substantially rose ...
^^
Line 4, column 111, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... upward trend registered growing trend . However, LaGuardia substantially rose o...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in addition, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17415730337 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74879883981 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657303370787 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0340473235 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208138277519 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078251576417 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101479053711 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148033345576 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138086978754 0.0819641961636 168% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.