The chart below shows the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph thowt the number of meals eaten in fast-food restaurants and sit-down restaurants. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart elucidates the proportion of the food budget an ordinary family allocates to restaurant snacks in various years, which are 1970, 1980, 1990, and 2000, whilst the line graph illustrates the number of delicious dishes eaten in fast-food restaurants and sit-down ones.
Overall, home cooking meals were highly preferred by the majority of residents in the past, however, the percentage of them have been equal with the eating out nourishments at the end of the time, when the fast-food reached a peak rather than the sit-down restaurant dishes.
To begin with, home-made foods were extremely prominent by 90 percent in 1970, when eatery meals were the least favored by only 10 percent among the individuals. Subsequently, this rate increased to 15 in 1980 and 35 percent in 1990, while home cooking made up 85 percent in 1980, 65 percent in 1990 respectively. The significant point was these two types of foods achieved a similar position by 50 percent in 2000.
Moreover, both of the dishes, which are fast-food and sit-down restaurants' meals were eaten in the monotony amount by 20 every year in 1970, then, they accelerated together during the 30-years period. However, sit-down places foods were more than the fast-foods by 32 each year, while fast-foods were consumed only 25 per year. An intriguing point was fast-foods reached a peak from 1990 by more than 50 every year and eaten 85 each year in 2000 when the ordinary meals were only consumed 50 per year.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, then, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96370967742 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61978571361 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.5876173405 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.875 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344459900865 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161924704695 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112491903658 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223869594256 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116852598822 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.