The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates the length of conversations made via 3 types of phone calls throughout the UK between 1995 and 2002.
Overall, while the amount of time spent on mobiles (all calls) and national and international-fixed line witnessed a significant increase over the period shown, the opposite was true for the local-fixed line. However, the amount of time on local-fixed line was by far the highest, followed in turn by national and international-fixed line and mobiles (all calls).
To begin with, the length of conversations through local-fixed line showed an upward trend from 72 billion minutes in 1995, reaching its peak at 90 billion in 1999. Over the next 4 years, it experienced a considerable decline and turned back to its first amount in 2002.
National and international-fixed line’s duration of conversations observed a steady growth throughout these seven years, from around 37 billion minutes to 60 billion.
The amount of time spent on mobiles (all calls) was almost 2 billion minutes at first. Since then, it rose gradually and finally reached 45 billion minutes in 2002.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, then, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19662921348 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25463262226 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567415730337 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4409516269 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13494883684 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719278669162 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456207805663 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932111399649 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435254592759 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.