The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph reveal some information about the time that people spend on using telephone, given in billion units, from 1995-2002 in the UK. As we can clearly see during this span of time local- fixed line had stayed in the first place.
The figure shows that total number of minutes of local- fixed line calls had an upward trend from approximately 70 billion to the optimum point which is 90 billion. Then, it gradually fell back to the 1995 figure by 2002.
On the other hand, the time that spend on national and international- fixed line steadily grow from near 38 billion to 60 billion. In the similar sense, the total number of mobile usage had rose gradually through the first 4 years. Then, it sharply elevate and reach somewhere in the vincity of 43 billion.
Overall, through the 7 years from 1999 to 2002, the gap between three categories became narrower than earlier time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'reveals'.
Suggestion: reveals
The graph reveal some information about the time that pe...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...ople spend on using telephone, given in billion units, from 1995-2002 in the UK. As we ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...illion units, from 1995-2002 in the UK. As we can clearly see during this span of ...
^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'elevates'?
Suggestion: elevates
...ugh the first 4 years. Then, it sharply elevate and reach somewhere in the vincity of 4...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, then, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 731.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71612903226 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30924486849 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6754877546 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.375 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210827525997 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863159234867 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592688998586 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12472985915 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474529502395 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.