The supplied bar graph gives information on telephone calls minutes used by British people through various types of call namely fixed line (local, national & international) and mobile between 1995 to 2002.
Overall, over the period of eight years, local-fixed lines were most famous telephone calls. However, some fluctuations the utilisation of this category decreased and in contrast national & international- fixed line and mobile telephones minutes increased significantly.
As can be observed, through local-fixed line just over 70 billion minute calls performed and minutes rose steadily to reach up to highest figure 90 billion in 1999. Afterwards, the number of minutes decreased gradually until 2002 and became equal to 1995 but still higher than other categories.
In contrast, National and international- fixed call duration surged gradually from approximately 38 million in 1995 to around 60 million in 2002. whereas, Mobile calls time period was less than 5 million in 1995 it climbed-up progressively and accounted more than 20 million minutes in 2000. In the year 2002, the total number of minutes by mobile became almost double of 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... various types of call namely fixed line local, national international and mob...
^^
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... call namely fixed line local, national international and mobile between 1995 t...
^^^
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed line local, national international and mobile between 1995 to 2002. Overal...
^^
Line 2, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...egory decreased and in contrast national international fixed line and mobile tel...
^^^
Line 2, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and in contrast national international fixed line and mobile telephones minutes...
^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er 70 billion minute calls performed and minutes rose steadily to reach up to hig...
^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the highest'.
Suggestion: to the highest
... and minutes rose steadily to reach up to highest figure 90 billion in 1999. Afterwards,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to reach up to highest figure 90 billion in 1999. Afterwards, the number of minut...
^^
Line 4, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In contrast, National and international fixed call duration surged gradually fro...
^^
Line 4, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...adually from approximately 38 million in 1995 to around 60 million in 2002. wher...
^^
Line 4, column 148, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...in 1995 to around 60 million in 2002. whereas, Mobile calls time period was less tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2002. whereas, Mobile calls time period was less than 5 million in 1995 it climb...
^^
Line 4, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llion minutes in 2000. In the year 2002, the total number of minutes by mobile be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37777777778 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7594730218 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0655273837 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 1.69756097561 766% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204781872971 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976955599072 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441556306968 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129125131374 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457640288799 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 78.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.