The stipulated bar diagram depicts the proportion of gender difference in teachers in various educational settings in United Kingdom in 2010. The mentioned parameters are nursery/pre-school, primary school, secondary school, college, private training and university.
It is clear from the data that, nursery and primary schools were dominated by female teachers, male teachers only constitute 5% and 11% respectively. While, in secondary schools women educators only had a small percentage of upper hand over men educators, almost 10%. Whereas, in college the proportion of male and female professors are equal, which was just over 50% each.
On the contrary, in private training and university education settings were mostly preferred by male teachers, where there proportion was more than the female educators. Private training centers had almost 65% male teachers and 35% female teachers. But in universities the male teachers had a considerable upper hand in terms of percentage, the difference was almost 40%.
In conclusion, Women educators were more interested in teaching children as compared to men. Though, higher education institutions was the male educators preferred teaching choice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n teaching children as compared to men. Though, higher education institutions was the ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77528089888 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05640696446 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584269662921 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4743516757 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.8 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193747072634 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849368173073 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465365691586 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117459290028 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305332521312 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 11.4140731707 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.