The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re

The first bar chart prevails data related to married and divorced people during a period of 30 years from 1970 t0 2000 in the U.S, whereas the second figure denotes the marital position of grown up in this country in both 1970 and 2000.

From the overall perspective, it is apparent from the information supplied that the number of married people was considerable high in 1970, on the stark contrast the number of divorced people who lived in this society was remarkably low in the same year. Also it is worthy to note that the married people proportion was always more than divorced individuals throughout the 30 years.

As is clearly illustrated by the first chart, married residents population witnessed a drop from 2.5 to 2 million during 30 years, which is not really a dramatic change. Moreover, in the year 1980 the number of both married and divorced American people was the highest among all years, which was reported 2.5 and almost 1.5 million respectively.additionaly divorced population remained steady and guard its self from substantial conversion in these 30 years.

Statistically shown by the second diagram that married people population seen a sharp fall by 70 percent in 1970 to 60 percent in 2000.on the other hand, the number of American people who never married slightly increased from almost 15 percent to 20 percent during 30 years.in both 1970 and 2000 the widowed and divorced people`s number was extremely less than other groups.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The first bar chart prevails data relate...
^^^^
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
... of 30 years from 1970 t0 2000 in the U.S, whereas the second figure denotes the ...
^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this country in both 1970 and 2000. From the overall perspective, it is appa...
^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ty was remarkably low in the same year. Also it is worthy to note that the married p...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d individuals throughout the 30 years. As is clearly illustrated by the fir...
^^^^
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... clearly illustrated by the first chart, married residents population witnessed a...
^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'residents'' or 'resident's'?
Suggestion: residents'; resident's
...lustrated by the first chart, married residents population witnessed a drop from 2.5 to...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...antial conversion in these 30 years. Statistically shown by the second diagra...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, moreover, really, second, so, whereas, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1229.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0368852459 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83486601657 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52868852459 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.9624398512 43.030603864 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 204.833333333 112.824112599 182% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.6666666667 22.9334400587 177% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 5.23603664747 220% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124253469803 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07062235552 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419784229724 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898094272346 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332099911264 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.6 13.2329268293 171% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.8 61.2550243902 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 10.3012195122 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.84 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.