The charts illustrate the differences in the use of water for three categories (agriculture, domestic, and industry) in various nations compared to that of the world in 2000, measured in percentage.
Overall, it is clear that Asian countries commonly used water for agricultural purpose, whereas water was used mostly for industry section in Canada. Additionally, New Zealand mainly used water in domestic field in the research year.
More specifically, India had the highest percentage of water used in agriculture, with a rate of over nine-tenths compared to 70% of that of the world generally. Meanwhile, Chinese farming purpose was widely dependent on the use of water, with roughly similar amount of that of the world in the observed year.
On the other hand, Canada experienced an opposite trend in the use of water, with 80% water used for industrial intention, which was eight times higher as opposed to that of New Zealand in 2000. New Zealand, however, shared approximately the same proportion of water use in agricultural and domestic fields, with 44% and 46% respectively in 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...intention, which was eight times higher as opposed to that of New Zealand in 2000....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22598870056 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9209749852 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9197330331 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.142857143 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196126452666 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102799935193 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335004917401 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127306052331 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033376394602 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.