The stipulated pie diagram illustrate the ages of population in 2000 and expected predictions of 2050 in Yemen and Italy. The mentioned parameters are different age groups of 0-14, 15-59 and 60 plus people.
In Yemen, in the year of 2000 majority of the population was belong to the category of 0-14 age, accounting half of the country's total population (50.1%). Whereas expected figures of 2050 showing a completely different trend, at that time youngsters belong to 15-59 age group will take the lead and going to account slightly more than half of the population which is 57.3%. But the senior citizens who comes under 60 plus age group expected to rise only a very small percentage of 2.
On the contrary, Italian figures showed a completely different story. The number of Italians coming under 15-59 age group was responsible for the majority of stake in the country's total number of citizens with a figure of 61.6% followed by the 60 plus age group (24.1%). Surprisingly the expected population growth in the middle age category is expected to be almost the same even after the 50 years of time, but there will be slight decline of 14% in comparison with 2000 figures. There will be a drastic rise of old age people (42.3%) is also predicted by 2050.
In conclusion, it is evident from the chart there will be some shifts in the number of people in various age group of Italian and Yemenis population. But the transformation will be in completely different age category for both nations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
... of 2000 majority of the population was belong to the category of 0-14 age, accounting...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umber of citizens with a figure of 61.6% followed by the 60 plus age group 24.1%....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, whereas, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1239.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8023255814 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6351943275 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.9 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7006202231 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.636363636 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151418017814 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702398053534 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479077493695 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110760966057 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228767663951 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.