The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they receive from employers.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The information provided in the bar charts illustrate the purposes for study among students who are in five different age groups and the percentage of support they received from workers.
Overall, while the percentage of students who study for career aged to under 26 has the highest number, students aged to over 49 have the lowest number for career. Further, students who study for interest aged to under 26 showed the lowest number. As they get older, their preferences change for study.
Looking at the first data in more detail, 80% of students aged to under 26 study for career. The same group has the lowest number when it comes to studying for interest. So, 10% of the students who aged to under 26 study for interest. students who are over 49 study for interest. it can be seen that the lowest number for career belong to the students who aged over 49.
Turning to the percentage of support of employers, students who are aged to under 26 stood at 70% which is the highest rate among other age groups. 3% of students aged to 30-39 received the lowest support from workers. This was followed by students who aged to 40-49 and over 49 at about 39% and 41%, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Students
...ho aged to under 26 study for interest. students who are over 49 study for interest. it ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...nts who are over 49 study for interest. it can be seen that the lowest number for ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65238095238 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34682687301 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452380952381 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8008145042 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4166666667 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256855169631 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1348589195 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754970383556 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212421183892 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824079481617 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.