The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country.
The pie charts depict the proportion of money spent by low income as well as a high-income group on the several items. The striking feature of the chart is that middle-class people spend almost a bit more than a quarter of income on the eatables.
At a fleeting glance, it is clearly observed that rich individuals had almost doubled interest in the recreational and cultural activities as contrasted to the poor. However, one-fourth income of the middle class devoted to the fuel bills whereas it was a small proportion of in case of profitable people. Not only this, wealthy people invested a huge amount of their income to the miscellaneous, meanwhile, a underprivileged class used 5% less than the others.
Moving further, almost everyone consumed an equal amount of money on clothing. Although, there was a wide difference in the expenses of Transport which was 9% and 16% for poverty-stricken class and wealthy people.
All-in-all, rich people prioritize the activities related to the fun while the poor class prefer to spend amount to fulfill their basic needs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...income to the miscellaneous, meanwhile, a underprivileged class used 5% less than...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09039548023 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97058042277 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610169491525 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.7676704597 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.625 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110811388466 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492511244885 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600132915809 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0642676383732 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679285394403 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.