The charts below show the percentage of time younger and older people spend on various internet activities in their free time.
The provided pie charts illustrate the proportion of time allocate by younger and older people on different internet activities in their spare time.
Overall, it is clear from the charts that mostly younger population spend their greatest time on social networking while, maximum internet used for making booking was by the older people.
As can be seen that exactly the same proportion (12%) of people from both groups, 18-26 age group and 60-70 age group allocated their time on making purchases. However, 50% of time of young blood was given to the making booking such as cinema and travel. Whereas, older people devoted quarter of time to the same activity.
With the difference of 3% accessing music and films were ahead of playing games, 21% and 18% respectively. In contrast, only 5% time of older people accounted for playing games and 15% for accessing music and films. Interestingly, research on health data was approximately same between both groups, it was almost two fifth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 254, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...king booking such as cinema and travel. Whereas, older people devoted quarter of time t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13496932515 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5548004142 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60736196319 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4202896749 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.625 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350057719953 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157634258646 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144020019975 0.0843802449381 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24821462102 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140003647174 0.0819641961636 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.