The diagram stipulates the reasons for selecting mode of transport while they are going for work.The mentioned parameters are bicycle and car.
People who use bicycle for their work commute are more more concerned about their health and environment. An equal percentage (30%) of people think that cycling will improve their health and fitmess and reduce the pollution factor. Whereas, commuters who utilize car think that it is more comfortable and safer option than cycling. Majority of car users accept comfort (40%) is main reason they choose to be in car followed by safety (21%).
15% cyclers see cycling is a perfect solution to the ever increasing problem of finding a parking space and 13% believe that it is a low cost mode. Only a small percentage of 12% cyclist argue that it is faster than driving. On the contrary, an equal percentage (14%) of car lovers claim that motoring is faster than cycling and it is easy to carry things to work. But merely 11% of four wheel users use cars because it is safer than cycling.
In conclusion, there are many reason that influence a person when they select their mode of commuting. It is always unique according each persons preference and interest.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...transport while they are going for work.The mentioned parameters are bicycle and ca...
^^^
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: more
... use bicycle for their work commute are more more concerned about their health and enviro...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'more' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: more
... use bicycle for their work commute are more more concerned about their health and enviro...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 26, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'many reasons'.
Suggestion: many reasons
...an cycling. In conclusion, there are many reason that influence a person when they selec...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ing. It is always unique according each persons preference and interest.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 5.60731707317 339% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86341463415 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45167451183 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1874993836 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6363636364 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150800080855 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537420557664 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481435533386 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924499186558 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451000879021 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.