The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after levaing college in 2008.

Essay topics:

The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after levaing college in 2008.

The table charts compare the number of draduate and postgraduate students who chose the types of different destination of UK after leaving college in 2008.
In general terms, comparing the two charts, most of graduate and posgraduate pupils enrolled further study while only a small number of students applied for voluntary work after leaving college in 2008.
According to the first chart, it is clearly show that 29,665 graduate students sought further study after leaving college while only slight amount of 3500 students chose voluntary work in 2008. Besides, 17735 students applied part-time work which is the same amount of graduate students who were still unemployment ( 16,235 pupils).
The second table show that the number of postgraduate students enrolled for further study which was still highest ( 2725 students ) than other destination. Meanwhile, only 345 students worked as voluntary work. Lastly, 2535 postgraduate students sought part-time work while 1625 pupils were still jobless after leaving college in 2008.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...upils enrolled further study while only a small number of students applied for voluntary work aft...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'showed', 'shown'.
Suggestion: showed; shown
...rding to the first chart, it is clearly show that 29,665 graduate students sought fu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate students who were still unemployment 16,235 pupils. The second table show th...
^^
Line 4, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or further study which was still highest 2725 students than other destination. M...
^^
Line 4, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y which was still highest 2725 students than other destination. Meanwhile, only ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, lastly, second, so, still, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54140127389 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47181359917 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515923566879 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5434307187 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.285714286 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326891472546 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180032367005 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537453682703 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229751696665 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048496519136 0.0819641961636 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.