The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008
The pie charts illustrate the distribution of energy to generate electricity in different countries from 2003 to 2008.
Overall, it is obvious that fossil fuel took up the largest rate in India and VN, while the nuclear power was the major contributor to the production of electricity in Sweden and Morocco.
As can be seen from the charts, fossil fuel accounted for the vast majority of total used energy in India, at 82%. In VN, its counterpart took up just over a half. On the other hand, the using of hydropower to generate electricity made up nearly a half in VN and a minority percentage of this renewable energy was used in India, at 14%. Moreover, the nuclear power was also used by Indian government with a insignificant proportion, at 4%.
In comparison with two countries above, in Morocco, hydropower consisted a massive 95% of the source of supply. Whereas the government of Sweden merely used over a half, 52%. Additionally, a minor portion of fossil fuel was taken to the electricity production in Sweden and Morocco, at 4% and 5% respectively. Nuclear power came out second in the list of used energy for providing electricity in Sweden (44%), but Morocco shoed no interest in this kind of energy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...was also used by Indian government with a insignificant proportion, at 4%. In ...
^
Line 7, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
... insignificant proportion, at 4%. In comparison with two countries above, in Morocco, h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, second, so, whereas, while, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84210526316 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87316490615 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55023923445 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6448075995 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.2 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128573190893 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592876832888 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928593487341 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117387741781 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120366092847 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.