The bar chart depicts the expenditure on fast foods per capita per week divided into three different income groups in Britain, while the line graph illustrates fast foods consumption trends from 1970 to 1990. Overall, people spend the most money on hamburger and it also holds the most consumed fast food during the two decades.
As can be seen from the bar chart, people from the high-income range spend the most money on hamburgers with over 40 pence/person per week, more than doubled Pizza’s number which is almost 20 pence/person. However, for fish and chips, they spend approximately 17 pence/person in a week. For the average earning group, Hamburger is again the most favorite food with about 33 pence/person, while fish and chips came second and Pizza came third with 25 pence/person and about 12 pence/person respectively. Interestingly, for the low-income group, fish and chips is the most favored food as people spend around 17 pence/person for this item while approximately 14 pence per capita for hamburgers and 7 pence per capita for pizza.
As shown in the line graph, fish and chips started as the most consumed fast food with more than 300 grams in 1970 but slowly decline until it reached a low of 200 grams, whereas it then began to rise and ended the period with more than 200 grams. In contrast, for both hamburger and pizza, they saw a sharp increase in the consumption rate, while pizza increased from almost 50 grams to almost 300 grams during the period, hamburger rocketed from nearly 100 grams to over 500 grams in two decades.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'foods'' or 'food's'?
Suggestion: foods'; food's
..., while the line graph illustrates fast foods consumption trends from 1970 to 1990. O...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, then, third, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 266.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8984962406 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64990664005 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515037593985 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 371.7 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.274421647 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.875 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.25 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146322498603 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800204182724 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923258551136 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14612835482 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123328722384 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.