The graphs compare 6 different types of position in terms of the percentage of employees in two year 1998 and 2001.
It is clear from the charts that the proportions of workers with a full time job by far were highest during the research period. Additionally, in the period of 4 years, only the figures for unemployed people and contract workers experienced rises.
In 1998, 37% of those surveyed had a full time job, while 27% of the sample were part time workers. Moreover, the proportions of self-employed and contract employees were 19% and 12% respectively. By contrast, the percentages of casual individuals and people without a job were smallest, while the former made up 3% of the sample, the latter occupied only 2%.
By 2001, the percentage of people with a full time job had fallen by 10% to 27%, in comparison with contact workers, which had risen to around 16%. In the same year, the figures for self employees and casual workers remained the same, at roughly 19% and 3% respectively. By contrast, the proportion of jobless people increased by 4% to 6%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
... that the proportions of workers with a full time job by far were highest during the rese...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
... In 1998, 37% of those surveyed had a full time job, while 27% of the sample were part ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
... time job, while 27% of the sample were part time workers. Moreover, the proportions of s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 42, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...y 2001, the percentage of people with a full time job had fallen by 10% to 27%, in compar...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81621621622 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79435933978 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556756756757 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.3345053654 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126932103301 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566826244449 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635157689572 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925475480976 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062065494847 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.