The diagram below show time spent watching tv by age and gender in the uk in 1995 and 1999
The provided bar graph reveals that the time spent for watching TV by different age group by both male and female in the uk between 1995 and 1998
As it is presented in bar graph that both genders with age of 4 to 15 watched television for around 17 hours in a week in 1995. However in 1999 it was stable at same position in both man and woman.In case of 16 to 24 old individuals show no change in males yet in females it witnessed a inclination of 2 hours
Moving further in terms of 25 to 34 old reveals that woman watching tv was recorded higher than men which was almost 25 hours In both initially years. Whereas in 55 to 64 age group was 27 hours in male but it increased in women to 31 to 32 hours in the later years. Lastly at 65 age in case of men was more than age 55 to 64 ages whereas reached to peak which was 35 hours per week in 1999
Overall it is explicitly seen that watching tv hours was higher as the age group move upward however woman show a complete dominanced in 1999 in watch tv
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 129, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... for around 17 hours in a week in 1995. However in 1999 it was stable at same position ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 198, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... at same position in both man and woman.In case of 16 to 24 old individuals show n...
^^
Line 2, column 286, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ge in males yet in females it witnessed a inclination of 2 hours Moving further...
^
Line 2, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es it witnessed a inclination of 2 hours Moving further in terms of 25 to 34 old ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, lastly, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.00497512438 4.92477711251 81% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21805753158 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522388059701 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 50.0 22.4926829268 222% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.1108244996 43.030603864 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 201.25 112.824112599 178% => OK
Words per sentence: 50.25 22.9334400587 219% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285217128326 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16720256813 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112259246902 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208796444664 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814576011109 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.5 13.2329268293 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.57 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.3012195122 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.81 11.4140731707 60% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 11.4329268293 236% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 22.0 10.9970731707 200% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.