The diagram below shows information about member attendance at various clubs in a metro city. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The supplied bar graph enumerates the presence of the members at numerous clubs in a metro city for a seven month period. The highlighting feature is the attendance of members at American Club.
As it is observed from the data, there was a mild rise in the visits of individuals at French Club from January to July. It was at its peak in July by well nigh to 78,000 visitors. Whereas, the figure of visitors remained the same throughout these seven months at British Club. The visitors made 60,000 visits per month at British Club.
To continue with, the number of members show dramatic fluctuations at Japanese Club in the bar graph. It touched the bottom in January with nearly 40,000 members and hit a high point in April with approximately 50,000 visitors. Moreover, the American Club reached at a peak in June with nearly 98,000 visitors. Whereas, in July, it decreased with nearly 15,000 visitors at American Club.
All in all, the feeblest visits made by visitors at Japanese Club in January whereas the maximal visits was at American Club by visitors in June.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n July by well nigh to 78,000 visitors. Whereas, the figure of visitors remained the sa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82162162162 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52987987542 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508108108108 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.800648069 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0909090909 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8181818182 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.09090909091 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158432654569 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825694261748 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468670186359 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116081976361 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430177788288 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.